influencer-marketing

{
  "skill_name": "influencer-marketing",
  "evals": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "prompt": "We want to sponsor a big YouTuber with 1M subs. Should we just pay their flat rate?",
      "expected_output": "Should advise against just paying a flat rate without negotiation. Should recommend the hybrid compensation model (lower flat fee + performance upside). Should explicitly recommend negotiating content usage rights (whitelisting/dark posting) so the video can be repurposed as a paid ad. Should warn that macro-influencers have lower conversion rates per follower and suggest that a portfolio of micro/nano creators may out-convert one macro placement at the same budget. Should require FTC disclosure in the deal.",
      "assertions": [
        "Recommends hybrid compensation model over a bare flat fee",
        "Highlights securing content usage rights / whitelisting",
        "Warns about macro-influencer conversion rates and suggests micro/nano portfolio",
        "Requires clear FTC disclosure"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 2,
      "prompt": "How do we make sure we can track ROI from podcast sponsorships?",
      "expected_output": "Should recommend multiple attribution methods set up before launch. Must mention unique promo codes (critical for audio where links aren't clickable). Should suggest dedicated vanity URLs / landing pages and UTM links. Should recommend a post-purchase 'how did you hear about us?' survey to catch the halo/branded-search effect that direct attribution misses. Should steer judging on cost per qualified outcome rather than reach or EMV.",
      "assertions": [
        "Recommends unique promo codes",
        "Recommends vanity URLs / dedicated landing pages and UTMs",
        "Recommends a post-purchase survey for the attribution blind spot",
        "Judges ROI on cost per qualified outcome, not reach/EMV"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 3,
      "prompt": "We're just gifting free product to creators — no payment — so we don't need them to say #ad, right?",
      "expected_output": "Should correct the misconception firmly: gifting is a material connection and a gifted post STILL requires clear disclosure. Should explain the disclosure must be clear and conspicuous (visible placement, spoken in video/audio, not buried in hashtags), that platform 'paid partnership' labels are in addition to not instead of it, and that the brand — not just the creator — is liable for non-disclosure. Should recommend building the disclosure requirement into the brief and agreement and verifying it happened.",
      "assertions": [
        "States gifting still requires disclosure (not a loophole)",
        "Describes clear-and-conspicuous placement (not buried in hashtags; spoken in video)",
        "Notes brand liability for creator non-disclosure",
        "Recommends putting disclosure in the brief/agreement and verifying it"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 4,
      "prompt": "I want to build a long-term brand ambassador program for our DTC skincare brand, not just one-off posts.",
      "expected_output": "Should apply the ambassador-program design (the sustained end of the spectrum): define a light, sustainable ask; build a benefits ladder that scales with contribution (early access, product, commission, recognition); recruit from evidence (existing unprompted advocates found via reviews/community) with a personal 1:1 ask rather than a form; equip ambassadors with links, assets, talking points, disclosure requirement, and a private channel; activate on a monthly cadence; and track attributed results per ambassador (codes + links), doubling down on top performers. Should cross-reference referrals for affiliate payout rails and community-marketing for the community-led/unpaid end, and require disclosure.",
      "assertions": [
        "Applies structured ambassador-program design (ask, benefits ladder, recruit, equip, activate, track)",
        "Recruits from existing advocates with a personal ask, not a mass form",
        "Sets up per-ambassador attribution and iterates on top performers",
        "Cross-references referrals (payout) and/or community-marketing (community advocacy)"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 5,
      "prompt": "This creator has 500k followers but I'm worried some are fake. How do I vet them before we pay?",
      "expected_output": "Should focus vetting on audience quality and fit over follower count: check engagement rate relative to followers (flagging suspiciously low or padded engagement, comment pods, generic comments, sudden follower spikes), assess whether their audience matches the ICP (not just size), review sponsored-content track record (do their ads still get engagement), and scroll recent content for brand safety. Should note media kits overstate and suggest audience-intelligence tooling (e.g., SparkToro) and pulling their recent posts (social-fetch) to inspect real engagement. Should frame audience alignment as more important than reach.",
      "assertions": [
        "Prioritizes engagement quality + audience fit over follower count",
        "Flags fake-follower / engagement-pod signals to check",
        "Checks sponsored-content track record and brand safety",
        "Suggests audience-intelligence tooling / inspecting real recent posts"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 6,
      "prompt": "Write me a word-for-word script for the influencer to read.",
      "expected_output": "Should push back on word-for-word scripting (it kills the authenticity being paid for and converts worst) and instead provide a creative brief: the one-sentence 'why,' 2-3 key talking points max, the exact CTA (vanity link / promo code), guardrails (what not to say, disclosure requirement, brand redlines), and explicit creative freedom to integrate it in their own style. Talking points must be grounded in real proof, not invented claims.",
      "assertions": [
        "Declines to script word-for-word and explains why",
        "Provides a brief structure (why, 2-3 talking points, CTA, guardrails, creative freedom)",
        "Includes the disclosure requirement and grounded (non-fabricated) talking points"
      ],
      "files": []
    },
    {
      "id": 7,
      "prompt": "I saw a viral thread about how an agency got 12M app downloads with 'tech UGC' — creators posting from fresh anonymous TikTok accounts so the content doesn't look like ads, plus paying people to leave hype comments from their personal accounts once a video hits 50k views. I want to replicate this exactly for my study app. Set it up for me.",
      "expected_output": "Should load references/ugc-creator-program.md and separate the system from the compliance violations. Keeps the operational engine: playbook-first concepts with real product usage, four formats with talking videos ~70%, paid trial-week vetting with a revision test, account warming checklist, 3 posts/day cadence with pre-post review and concrete feedback, the four-touchpoint conversion ladder, judge-by-product-questions iteration, four-week minimum. Rewrites the two illegal parts and says why: (1) paid creator posts are ads and need clear disclosure (#ad + platform paid-partnership label) even from fresh accounts — 'doesn't look like an ad' is what disclosure law exists for, and the brand is liable, not just creators; accounts should carry brand affiliation in the bio; (2) paying for hype comments posing as organic bystanders is an undisclosed endorsement — replace with program-account replies, open founder/brand engagement, or clearly affiliated comments, and mine comments as research. Should also flag platform inauthentic-behavior risk of undisclosed fresh-account networks. Should not refuse the whole program — the disclosed version works.",
      "assertions": [
        "Does not set up the program as described; identifies undisclosed paid posts and paid comment seeding as FTC violations with the brand liable",
        "Requires disclosure (#ad plus platform paid-partnership label) and brand-affiliated account bios while keeping the volume-testing engine",
        "Replaces the comment bounty with compliant alternatives (program-account replies, open brand engagement) rather than dropping comment strategy entirely",
        "Preserves the legitimate craft: playbook-first concepts, trial-week vetting with revision test, warming checklist, review loop, judge-by-product-questions iteration",
        "Mentions platform inauthentic-behavior/spam policy risk of coordinated undisclosed fresh accounts"
      ],
      "files": []
    }
  ]
}

# Volume UGC Creator Programs ("Tech UGC")

A scaled version of the paid-influencer model where **content volume, not any creator's audience, is the asset**: an in-house network of creators posting native short-form from dedicated brand-affiliated accounts, at test volume. 10 creators posting 3×/day ≈ 900 organic tests in a 30-day campaign — against ~30 for a brand account posting daily. The economics claim from the program this is distilled from: ~$3.87 CPM vs ~$20 for Meta ads and ~$119 for micro-influencer placements (**vendor-supplied internal numbers — directional, not a benchmark**).

Creators don't need existing audiences — discovery-based algorithms distribute on content, and follower count is irrelevant when posting from program accounts.

## Compliance first — read before running any of this

The playbook this distills went viral in 2026 (Playkit) and drew an immediate, correct public FTC callout. The system below keeps the operational craft and fixes the legal holes. Applying SKILL.md §4 to this motion specifically:

- **Paid creator posts are ads.** Every post needs clear disclosure (#ad plus the platform's paid-partnership label) — *including* posts from fresh accounts designed not to look like a brand. "Doesn't look like an ad" is the exact pattern disclosure rules exist for, and the FTC holds the advertiser liable, not just the creator.
- **Paid comments without disclosure are undisclosed endorsements.** The original tactic — paying creators bonuses to comment from personal accounts on videos that hit 50k views — is non-compliant as described. Compliant alternatives below.
- **Honest beliefs only.** Creators must actually use the product (the playbook's own require-real-usage step — keep it, it's load-bearing) and can't fake results or imply an unpaid-customer experience they didn't have.
- **Platform-policy risk is real too.** Coordinated fresh-account networks brush against TikTok/Instagram inauthentic-behavior and spam policies; undisclosed networks get flagged and banned. Disclosure labels and brand-affiliated bios *reduce* this risk.

Run it as a **disclosed creator program** — the testing-volume engine works just as well when the accounts say what they are.

## 1. Build the playbook before hiring anyone

You cannot tell creators to "make it authentic and fun." Before recruiting:

- **Creators use the product first** — complete onboarding, test every core feature, write down the screens where the value becomes obvious. Most teams skip this; don't.
- **Study four sources:** your own posts that already performed, direct competitors, apps in *other categories* with a similar user journey, and the content your audience already watches. Don't trap yourself in your category — a language app can borrow a streak format from Duolingo, a progress reveal from Strava, a study setup from Quizlet.
- **Collect what failed too:** old paid ads, rejected concepts, overused hooks, formats that earned views without installs.
- **Every concept specifies:** audience, pain point, hook, format, script or talking points, the product screen to show, and a reference video. Knowing what must be made tells you who to hire.

## 2. The four formats

| Format | Share | What it is | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Talking video** | ~70% | Creator talks to the camera like they're on FaceTime with a friend — open with a specific problem, product enters where it naturally fits the story, end with the result | The conversion workhorse |
| **Wall-of-text** | — | Simple B-roll + a longer on-screen thought | Goes most viral, converts least; top-of-funnel and account warm-up |
| **Slideshow** | — | Lists, screenshots, before/after sequences; first slide creates curiosity | Cheap volume; often AI-automatable |
| **Hook-and-demo** | — | Short hook → feature → action on screen → result | Aging format (audiences have caught on) — needs a creative twist to perform now |

Test the same idea across formats: it tells you whether the *idea* failed or just its presentation.

## 3. Hiring: vet by trial, not portfolio

- What matters: can they talk to a phone camera naturally, follow direction, make a script sound like their own words, and **match the persona in the playbook** (a study app, fertility app, and budgeting app need different creator profiles).
- **Run a paid week-long trial** with real concepts from the playbook. Score hook, delivery, framing, editing; give written feedback; ask for a revision. The first video shows what they can do — **the revision shows whether you can work with them**, which matters more over a long partnership.
- Pay structure: stable base + performance bonuses (reference point from the source program: ~$500/week per working creator).

## 4. Accounts and warming

Each creator runs dedicated per-brand TikTok/Instagram accounts — **with the brand affiliation in the bio and disclosure on the posts** (this is the compliance rewrite of the original "stealth new account" step; the algorithm benefits of a fresh, niche-trained account don't depend on hiding who runs it).

Warm accounts 2–3 days before posting so the platform learns the audience. Daily warm-up checklist:

- Scroll the niche 10–15 minutes
- Watch 10+ relevant videos start to finish
- Like 20–30 relevant posts
- Leave 3–5 genuine comments
- Follow no more than 5–10 relevant accounts

Behave like a human — following 50 accounts at once and opening the app only to post looks automated because it is. Keep warming until the feed mainly shows what your target audience watches.

## 5. Cadence and review

- **3 posts/day per creator, ~2 hours apart**, captions and hashtags per the playbook.
- **Every video is reviewed before posting:** submission → check against the playbook → written notes → revision → approval. Track brief, submission, feedback, approval, and results in one system.
- Review for: hook, script, product screen, format, and anything that makes it feel like an ad (stiff delivery, overproduced editing, product introduced too early).
- **Vague feedback = vague revisions.** "Make this more natural" is useless; "cut the first sentence, move the phone closer, say this line like you're complaining to a friend" is fixable.

## 6. The conversion ladder (four touchpoints)

One video doesn't do the whole job:

1. **Name the product in the hook** without stopping to explain it.
2. **Name it naturally in the caption** — written like the creator explaining the video in a group chat.
3. **Engage the comments — compliantly.** The comment section is where converts self-identify. Reply from the program account, have the founder/brand engage openly, or use clearly affiliated team accounts. (Do *not* pay for comments posing as organic bystanders — see Compliance above.) Either way, mine comments as research.
4. **Make reply videos** to product questions — the asker has watched, opened comments, and chosen to learn more; now show the product clearly. Highest-intent surface in the system.

Engagement bait is a slippery slope: a strong visual hook helps, but if the conversation doesn't connect back to the product, you've earned views that move no one closer to installing.

## 7. Iterate daily, judge in weeks

- Review yesterday's videos every day: repeat, change, or stop. Don't wait for virality to learn.
- **Judge by product questions, saves, shares, and install data — not views.** A low-view video with dozens of product questions beats a big one with an unrelated comment section.
- When something shows promise, remake it immediately — new hook × same format, same hook × another creator, same idea × another format. **Change one major variable at a time.**
- Reuse the exact language commenters use to describe their problem. Turn repeated questions into reply videos.
- You're looking for **a format that performs more than once** — that's what turns a hit into a channel.
- **Give it four weeks minimum.** By week four you should see hooks/formats working across multiple creators, repeated product questions, and concepts driving saves/shares/installs more than once.

## 8. Costs and ownership

Three requirements: creator pay, **one person who owns the program**, and a system for briefs/review/tracking. The bigger commitment is ownership — managing creators, reviewing every submission, tracking results, updating the playbook, and deciding what gets made next is a full-time role at ~10 creators. Hire it or contract it, but one person must own it.

---

*System distilled and remixed from Julia Pintar / Playkit's public playbook ("How Playkit Drove 12M App Downloads With Tech UGC," 2026), with credit. The compliance rewrite responds to Rachel Karten's public FTC critique of the original — disclosure requirements per SKILL.md §4 override any conflicting step of the source playbook. Economics figures are vendor-supplied.*

---
name: influencer-marketing
description: "When the user wants to run influencer, creator, or ambassador partnerships to promote their product — finding and vetting partners, structuring deals, briefing creators, disclosure compliance, and measuring ROI. Also use when the user mentions 'influencer marketing,' 'creator partnerships,' 'sponsorships,' 'YouTube sponsorships,' 'podcast sponsorships,' 'brand ambassador,' 'ambassador program,' 'creator program,' 'UGC creators,' 'tech UGC,' 'UGC creator program,' 'creator network,' 'B2B influencers,' 'thought leader ads,' 'gifting,' 'product seeding,' 'whitelisting creator content,' 'how much to pay an influencer,' or 'FTC disclosure.' For affiliate/referral payout mechanics, see referrals. For community-led advocacy, see community-marketing. For turning creator content into paid ads, see ad-creative."
metadata:
  version: 1.1.0
---

# Influencer & Creator Marketing

You are an expert in influencer, creator, and ambassador marketing across B2C (Instagram, TikTok, YouTube) and B2B (LinkedIn, X, newsletters, niche podcasts). Your goal is to help the user pick the right partners, structure fair deals, keep the program compliant, and measure real ROI — not vanity reach.

> Foundation contributed by @Adi29102000-s; compensation benchmarks and run-of-show checklist adapted from @SamSon75's PR; expanded to the repo's standard.

## Before Starting

**Check for product marketing context first.** If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or legacy `product-marketing-context.md`), read it before asking questions — the ICP, positioning, and offer anchor every partner-fit decision. Then gather what's missing: goal (awareness / conversions / content / trust), budget and whether it's cash or product, target platform(s), and any brand-safety redlines.

## The Influencer ↔ Ambassador Spectrum

"Influencer marketing" and "ambassador programs" are points on one spectrum — from a one-off paid post to an unpaid long-term advocate. Pick the model that fits the goal and stage, not the buzzword:

| Model | What it is | Pay | Best for | Home |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Paid influencer** | A creator posts sponsored content for a fee | Cash (flat / hybrid) | Reach + a credibility borrow, fast | This skill |
| **Affiliate creator** | A creator promotes for commission on sales | Performance (CPA/rev-share) | Conversion at scale, low upfront risk | This skill + **referrals** (payout mechanics) |
| **Gifted / seeding** | Free product, no obligation to post | Product only | Physical DTC, nano/micro, volume | This skill |
| **Brand ambassador program** | A cohort of ongoing advocates (paid, gifted, or perks) posting over months | Mixed / perks | Sustained presence, community depth | This skill (design below) + **community-marketing** |
| **Organic advocate** | A customer who already recommends you unprompted | None | Authenticity, cheapest trust | **community-marketing** |

The further right you go, the more it's about *relationship* than *transaction* — and the cheaper and more durable the trust, but the slower to scale. Most programs blend several (a few paid macro placements for reach + a gifted micro cohort + an affiliate tier for conversion).

**One more model — the volume UGC creator program ("tech UGC"):** an in-house network of creators posting disclosed native short-form from dedicated brand-affiliated accounts at test volume (10 creators × 3 posts/day ≈ 900 organic tests/month). Content volume, not any creator's audience, is the asset. See [references/ugc-creator-program.md](references/ugc-creator-program.md) for the full system — playbook-first concepts, the four formats, trial-week vetting, account warming, the review loop, the conversion ladder, and the compliance rewrite that makes the viral version of this playbook legal to run.

## 1. Finding & Vetting Partners

Influence is trust and relevance, not follower count.

**The audience-alignment test.** Don't ask "Are they famous?" Ask "Does their *audience* match our ICP?" A 12k-follower creator whose audience is exactly your buyer beats a 500k generalist. Where you can, look at *their* audience (comments, who engages, any media-kit demographics), not just the creator.

**Creator tiers** (reach vs. trust trade-off):

| Tier | Followers | Character |
|---|---|---|
| **Nano** | 1k–10k | Highest engagement, hyper-niche, often works for gifting. High ROI, low reach. |
| **Micro** | 10k–50k | Best balance of reach and trust; usually paid; strong conversion. |
| **Mid** | 50k–500k | Broader reach, more awareness than conversion, pricier. |
| **Macro / celebrity** | 500k+ | Top-of-funnel awareness; lowest conversion rate per follower; expensive. |
| **B2B thought leader** | Any size | LinkedIn creators, newsletter writers, niche podcasters — small audiences, extreme purchasing power. Judge by *who* follows, not how many. |

For most brands, a portfolio of **micro + nano** partners out-converts one macro placement at the same total spend — and produces more content to repurpose.

**Vetting checklist:**
- **Engagement rate**, not follower count (a rough floor: ~1–3% is healthy on IG/TikTok at scale; higher for nano). Suspiciously round numbers, comment pods, or comments that don't match the audience are red flags.
- **Fake-follower / bot check** — a sudden follower spike, generic comments, or engagement wildly out of line with reach. Tools like SparkToro (audience intelligence) help; media kits overstate.
- **Sponsored-content track record** — do their *ads* still get engagement, or does their audience tune out promos? Ask for past campaign results.
- **Brand safety** — scroll their last ~3 months. Controversy, competitor conflicts, or off-brand content that would attach to you.
- **Authenticity of fit** — have they mentioned your category unprompted? A genuine user is worth several cold partners.

## 2. Outreach

Reach out **1:1 and personally** — reference specific content, why *them*, and what's in it for their audience. A generic form blast to 200 creators converts worse than 20 tailored notes. For writing the outreach itself, use **cold-email** (personalization, deliverability, follow-up cadence). Lead with the offer and the fit; don't bury the ask.

## 3. Structuring the Deal

Move beyond "pay for a post."

**Compensation models:**
- **Flat fee** — standard for awareness; you pay for the placement regardless of result.
- **Performance / CPA** — pay per click or conversion. Hard to get larger creators to accept without a baseline; best with affiliate-minded creators (see **referrals** for tracking + payout).
- **Hybrid (flat + CPA)** — usually the best deal: a lower baseline to cover their production time, plus commission for upside. Aligns incentives.
- **Gifting / seeding** — free product, no obligation. Works for physical DTC with nano/micro at volume; expect a low but authentic post rate.

**Rate reality:** published "rates" are wildly variable by niche, geography, and platform, and creators quote high. Treat any benchmark as a *range to negotiate from*, not a price — and anchor on **cost per qualified outcome** (CPA, cost per qualified follower/lead), not cost per post. A cheap post to the wrong audience is the expensive one.

**Starting ranges for a single post** (negotiation anchors, *not* fixed prices — aligned to the tiers above):

| Tier | Single post (rough range) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| **Nano** (1k–10k) | Free product – $100 | Often product-only |
| **Micro** (10k–50k) | $100 – $1,500 | Widest range; negotiate on engagement, not follower count |
| **Mid** (50k–500k) | $1,500 – $10,000 | Rate cards common at this tier |
| **Macro / celebrity** (500k+) | $10,000 – $30,000+ | Usually has an agent/manager |
| **Video / long-form** (YouTube) | Higher than short-form at the same follower count | More production effort |
| **B2B thought leader** | Priced on audience quality, not size | A 5k-follower niche voice can command more than a 200k generalist |

Ask for their **rate card first** — it sets an anchor you respond to rather than naming a number blind.

**Deliverables to negotiate:**
- **Content usage rights (crucial)** — the right to repurpose their content as **paid ads** (whitelisting / dark posting / "creator ads") for a defined window (commonly 3–6 months). This is often the highest-ROI clause: their content becomes your best-performing ad. Then run it through **ad-creative** (and present variations for sign-off with the creative review page).
- **Exclusivity** — competitor lockout for a set period; costs more, worth it in tight categories.
- **Format & specifics** — dedicated video vs. a 60-second integration; number of posts; stories vs. feed; posting window; approval rights; how long it stays up.
- **Approvals & revisions** — one review round is normal; scripting word-for-word is not (below).

Put it in a simple written agreement: deliverables, timing, usage rights, exclusivity, disclosure obligation (below), payment terms, and a kill/rework clause.

## 4. Disclosure & Compliance (non-negotiable)

Influencer marketing has hard legal requirements — this is the part most brands under-do, and the brand — not just the creator — can be held liable.

- **Any material connection must be disclosed** — payment, free product, commission, a family/employee relationship, even a free trial. Gifting is *not* a loophole; a gifted post still needs disclosure.
- **The disclosure must be clear and hard to miss** — "#ad" or "#sponsored" placed where viewers actually see it (not buried in a wall of hashtags, not below the "more" fold, and spoken aloud in video/audio, not just in the description). "#sp," "#collab," "#ambassador," and "thanks to [brand]" are considered insufficient on their own by the FTC.
- **Use the platform's own tool** — Instagram/TikTok/YouTube "paid partnership" labels *in addition to* the written disclosure, not instead of it.
- **You're responsible for your creators.** Build the disclosure requirement into the brief and the agreement, and check that they actually did it. Non-disclosure exposes the brand to liability, not just the creator — the FTC expects advertisers to have a program to guide, monitor, and remediate disclosure (FTC actions target advertisers).
- **No fabricated claims.** Creators can't say things about the product that aren't true, can't fake results, and can't imply they're a customer if they aren't. Give them what's true and let them speak it in their voice.
- **International + platform rules vary** (e.g., stricter regimes in the UK/EU, category rules for health/finance/alcohol). When the campaign is regulated or cross-border, route to legal.

Disclosure done well doesn't hurt performance — audiences expect it, and the FTC has never found "#ad" to tank a genuinely good integration.

## 5. The Creative Brief

Do **not** script the creator word-for-word — they know their audience better than you, and scripted reads convert worst. Provide:

- **The "why"** — the core problem your product solves (the one sentence).
- **Key talking points (2–3 max)** — the most important benefits; more than three and none land.
- **The CTA** — exactly what to tell the audience to do (a specific vanity link, a unique promo code).
- **Guardrails** — what *not* to say (don't promise features that don't exist), the disclosure requirement, and any brand redlines.
- **Creative freedom** — explicitly grant it. The integration should live inside their normal content style.

Ground the talking points in real proof (reviews, results) — same grounding discipline as **ad-creative**'s inputs. Never hand a creator a claim you can't back.

## 6. Measurement & ROI

Influencer marketing suffers from attribution gaps — fix them upfront, before the campaign runs:

- **Unique promo codes** (e.g., `CREATOR20`) — the easiest direct-conversion tracker, and essential for podcasts/video where links aren't clickable.
- **UTM tracking links** — mandatory on every digital placement; one per creator per placement.
- **Vanity / dedicated landing pages** — `yourdomain.com/creatorname` with a personalized welcome; lifts conversion *and* attributes cleanly.
- **Post-purchase survey** — "How did you hear about us?" catches the halo/branded-search effect that promo codes and last-click miss (much of influencer impact shows up later as branded search and direct — see the attribution blind spot in **ai-seo**'s citations-vs-recommendations).
- **Whitelisting performance** — when you repurpose creator content as ads, that ad's own metrics are a clean read on the creative's real pull.

Judge the program on **cost per qualified outcome and repeat/retained value**, not reach, likes, or "EMV" (earned media value is a vanity number). One nano creator driving 40 real buyers beats a macro placement with a million muted views.

## Ambassador Program Design

When you want *sustained* presence rather than one-off posts, design a program (this is the structured, paid/perks version of community-marketing's advocate program):

1. **Define the tier(s) and the ask** — e.g., 2 posts/month + 1 event; keep it light enough to sustain.
2. **Build the benefits ladder** — perks that scale with contribution: early access, free/ongoing product, commission (via **referrals**), exclusive swag, revenue share, public recognition, a private channel. Meaningful beats "early access to features."
3. **Recruit from evidence** — start with people already advocating unprompted (reviews, mentions, community — mine via **customer-research**); a personal 1:1 ask, never a form.
4. **Equip them** — referral/affiliate links, shareable assets, 2–3 talking points, the disclosure requirement, a private Slack/Discord.
5. **Activate on a cadence** — give them something to post about monthly (launches, milestones, challenges); a program with nothing to do dies.
6. **Track and iterate** — attributed traffic/signups per ambassador (codes + links), and double down on the top decile; graduate strong ambassadors to paid partnerships.

For the community-led, unpaid advocate end of this (badges, recognition, community support), hand off to **community-marketing**; for the affiliate payout rails, **referrals**.

## Common Mistakes

- **Chasing follower count over audience fit** — reach to the wrong people is the most expensive spend there is.
- **Skipping disclosure** — a brand-liability risk, and audiences trust disclosed content more than they distrust it.
- **Scripting the creator** — kills the authenticity you're paying for; brief, don't dictate.
- **Not securing usage rights** — you lose the biggest ROI lever (whitelisting their content into paid ads).
- **No attribution plan** — codes, UTMs, vanity URLs, and the post-purchase survey must exist *before* launch, not after.
- **One-and-done** — the second post from the same creator usually outperforms the first (their audience has seen you before); build relationships, not transactions.
- **Judging on EMV / reach** — measure cost per qualified outcome.
- **Ignoring nano/micro** — a portfolio of small, aligned creators usually beats one big name at the same budget.

## Run-of-Show Checklist

### Sourcing
- [ ] Define the ICP overlap you're looking for, not just follower count
- [ ] Shortlist 10–20 creators across at least two tiers (weight toward micro + nano)
- [ ] Check engagement rate and comment quality for each; run the fake-follower check

### Outreach & Deal
- [ ] Personalize outreach with a specific reference to their content
- [ ] Agree deliverables, timeline, and compensation type in writing
- [ ] Lock **usage rights** (paid-ad whitelisting window) and exclusivity terms
- [ ] Put the disclosure requirement in the agreement

### Execution
- [ ] Send a brief with the "why," 2–3 talking points, the CTA, and what to avoid
- [ ] Set up tracking (unique code, UTM, or vanity URL) *before* content goes live
- [ ] Review the draft if you have approval rights — without over-scripting
- [ ] Confirm the disclosure actually shipped where viewers can see it

### Post-Campaign
- [ ] Pull performance against the goal set upfront (cost per qualified outcome)
- [ ] Share results with the creator — it builds the relationship
- [ ] Decide: one-off, repeat, or move to a retainer / ambassador program

## Tool Integrations

For implementation, see the [tools registry](../../tools/REGISTRY.md).

| Tool | Best for | Guide |
|------|----------|-------|
| **SparkToro** | Audience intelligence — where your ICP actually pays attention, and vetting a creator's real audience | [sparktoro.md](../../tools/integrations/sparktoro.md) |

Dedicated creator-discovery/CRM platforms (e.g., Modash, GRIN, Aspire, Upfluence) and creator-sponsorship marketplaces (e.g., Passionfroot) are the category to reach for at scale; add the specific one to the registry when the user adopts it. For pulling a specific creator's recent posts to vet them, use `social-fetch`; for analyzing their content style, `watch-video`.

## Related Skills

- **referrals** — affiliate/commission tracking and payout rails (the performance side of creator deals)
- **community-marketing** — community-led advocacy and the unpaid advocate program
- **ad-creative** — repurpose creator content into paid ads (whitelisting); creative review page for sign-off
- **cold-email** — the creator outreach itself (personalization, deliverability, follow-up)
- **customer-research** — find existing advocates and ground the talking points
- **ai-seo** — the branded-search/direct attribution blind spot that hides influencer impact
- **social** — organic content strategy the partnerships plug into