Skills로 돌아가기
lilmgenius/paperthin검사 통과

SKILL DETAIL

sip

lilmgenius/paperthin/sip

After creating or changing any artifact or skill, taste-test it with our own skills instead of trusting your in-session judgment — recursive self-improvement, made automatic. This skill is designed to turn quality checks into a triggered habit, ensuring objective verification before delivery. The workflow includes cold-reading the artifact (using shower), verifying factual claims (using factchk or mandela), checking consistency (using ssotize), detecting portability claims (using detool), and tidying up documentation (using re0). The skill orchestrates and routes findings, while the individual skills perform the actual work, with rules to skip checks that don't apply.

설치 수 · 368출처 보기

Installation

npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill sip

스킬 파일

SKILL.md

최근 동기화 · 2026. 8. 27.

SKILL.md
---
name: sip
description: "After you create or change an artifact or skill, taste-test it with our own skills instead of trusting your in-session judgment — recursive self-improvement, made automatic. Use right after writing or editing anything, before calling it done, committing, or handing it off."
---

Taste your own cooking: the moment you finish making something, check it with the very skills this repo ships before you serve it.

## Goal

A reminder buried in docs ("remember to verify") won't reliably fire in a fresh session. `sip` makes the recursive self-improvement loop a triggered habit: right after any create or change, run our own skills on the result — the clean checks and the true ones — so quality doesn't ride on the author's biased in-session judgment.

## Workflow

1. Spot the trigger: you just created or changed an artifact or skill and are about to call it done, commit, or hand it off.
2. **Cold-read it** — run `shower` on the artifact (fresh-eyes comprehension / handoff check).
3. **Verify it's true** — if the artifact asserts a reality-grounded claim, run `factchk`; if it defines an eval, metric, or experiment, run `mandela`. Skip when it has neither.
4. **Check consistency** — run `ssotize` in audit mode across the repo for anything the change duplicated or contradicted; execute its consolidation plan only after approval.
5. **Detool portability claims** — run `detool` only when the artifact claims portability, tool-neutrality, stack-agnostic durability, or cross-agent reuse. Skip when it is provenance, operational notes, a tool-targeted runbook, or does not claim portability.
6. **Tidy** — `re0` the changed docs so the result reads as a clean v0, not a patch over a draft.
7. Apply the findings here, then serve it.

## Rules

- Trigger on your OWN output, right after making it — that's when bias is highest and a check is cheapest.
- Use the skills; don't re-implement them — `shower` for clarity, `factchk`/`mandela` for truth, `ssotize` for SSOT, `detool` for portability claims, `re0` for cleanup. `sip` orchestrates and routes findings back to the author session to fix; the skills do the work.
- Skip what plainly doesn't apply, or any check whose skill isn't installed — run only what's present. `factchk`/`mandela` fire only when there is a claim or an eval; `detool` fires only when the artifact claims portability, tool-neutrality, stack-agnostic durability, or cross-agent reuse; a one-line prose tweak may need only a consistency check. Say what you skipped and why.
- Stop at the artifact — `sip` never touches git or makes commits.
- Chain only model-invoked skills; a user-invoked skill (marked `disable-model-invocation`) is a human's to fire deliberately, so `sip` must not call one.

## Verification

Before finishing:

1. The change was actually run through the relevant skills, not eyeballed.
2. Findings were applied (or consciously deferred with a stated reason).
3. The artifact actually changed as a result (a diff exists), or every skipped skill has a stated reason.