SKILL DETAIL
implement-specs
warpdotdev/common-skills/implement-specs
This skill is used after product and tech specs are approved. It guides the engineer to read the approved specs from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, treating them as the source of truth for user-facing behavior and architecture, respectively. The engineer then plans and implements the feature, updating the specs if the implementation reveals changes in behavior or design, and keeps all changes in the same PR to ensure review aligns with the shipped feature. The skill also suggests optional tracking documents like PROJECT_LOG.md and DECISIONS.md for large features, and emphasizes verification through unit and integration tests.
Installation
npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill implement-specs
스킬 파일
SKILL.md
최근 동기화 · 2026. 8. 29.
SKILL.md›
---
name: implement-specs
description: Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, keeping specs and code aligned in the same PR as implementation evolves. Use after the product and tech specs are approved and the next step is building the feature.
---
# implement-specs
Implement an approved feature from `PRODUCT.md` and `TECH.md`.
## Overview
Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved. The goal is to build the feature described by the specs while keeping the checked-in specs and the implementation aligned as the work evolves.
Approved specs should live directly under a ticket-named directory in `specs/`, for example `specs/APP-1234/PRODUCT.md` and `specs/APP-1234/TECH.md`.
In many cases, the implementation should be pushed in the same PR as the product and tech specs. As the engineer iterates, changes to `PRODUCT.md`, `TECH.md`, and the code should all be pushed in that same PR so review stays anchored to the feature that will actually ship.
## Prerequisites
Before using this skill:
- confirm that `PRODUCT.md` exists
- confirm that `TECH.md` exists when the feature warranted one
- confirm that the relevant specs have been reviewed and approved enough to start implementation
## Workflow
### 1. Read the approved specs first
Treat:
- `PRODUCT.md` as the source of truth for user-facing behavior
- `TECH.md` as the source of truth for architecture, sequencing, and implementation shape
Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.
### 2. Offer optional implementation aids for large features
For large or long-running features, optionally offer one of these aids to the user before implementation begins:
- `PROJECT_LOG.md` to track checkpoints, explored paths, partial findings, and current implementation state
- `DECISIONS.md` to capture concrete product and technical decisions made during the PRD and tech design process
These are optional aids, not required deliverables. Offer them when they would reduce confusion or help future agents avoid re-exploring the same paths.
### 3. Plan and implement against the specs
Break the work into concrete implementation steps, then implement the feature against the approved specs.
During implementation:
- keep behavior aligned with `PRODUCT.md`
- keep architecture and sequencing aligned with `TECH.md`
- add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands
Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.
### 4. Update specs as the implementation evolves
If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.
In particular:
- update `PRODUCT.md` when user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change
- update `TECH.md` when architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change
- keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes
The PR should describe the feature that actually ships, not just the initial draft of the specs.
### 5. Verify against the specs
Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.
Prefer:
- unit tests and regression coverage that follow the repository's local testing conventions
- integration or end-to-end tests for important user flows
## Best Practices
- Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.
- Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.
- Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.
- Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.
## Related Skills
- `spec-driven-implementation`
- `write-product-spec`
- `write-tech-spec`