get-convex/agent-skills已通过检查
SKILL DETAIL
convex-cost
get-convex/agent-skills/convex-cost
成本意外通常源于少数函数读取的数据量远超预期——这些读取密集型的模式正是 convex-advisor 所标记的性能问题,但这里从成本角度审视。该能力使支出变得清晰:它读取部署自身的字节数/文档数读取证据,将其归因于驱动成本的函数,预测其随流量增长的趋势,并指出最便宜的修复方式。它还遵循 confirm-cost 纪律(Supabase 对付费操作的结构性同意):在进行任何计量操作前,明确说明价格并获得明确同意。 工作流程包括:通过 deploy-guard 保护部署;通过官方 MCP 收集 insights、tables 和 functionSpec 数据;按每次调用的读取量乘以调用量对函数进行排序;说明成本驱动因素如何随数据增长(全表扫描呈线性增长,索引访问保持平稳);为每个驱动因素指出最便宜的修复方式(如添加索引、使用分页或缓存);对任何付费操作执行 confirm-cost;最后报告当前成本驱动因素及其证据、增长曲线和修复建议。
安装量 · 445查看来源
Installation
npx skills add https://github.com/get-convex/agent-skills --skill convex-cost
技能文件
SKILL.md
最近同步 · 2026年10月15日
SKILL.md›
---
name: convex-cost
description: "Preview Convex spend — rank functions by bytes/documents-read × call-volume from insights, project each cost driver's growth curve, name the cheapest fix; confirm-cost for paid actions."
---
<!-- GENERATED from convex-agents content/capabilities/convex-cost.json — do not edit by hand. -->
# Preview what this app will cost
Cost surprises come from a handful of functions reading far more data than anyone realized — the same read-heavy patterns convex-advisor flags for perf, seen through the money lens. This capability makes spend legible: it reads the deployment's own bytes/documents-read evidence, attributes it to the functions driving it, projects how it grows with traffic, and names the cheapest fix. It also carries the confirm-cost discipline (Supabase's structural consent for paid actions): before anything metered, state the price and get an explicit yes.
## Workflow
1. GUARD: deploy-guard — a cost read is read-only over dev/prod (insights is cloud+user-auth only; not previews). Announce the deployment.
2. GATHER the spend evidence via the official MCP: `insights` for the bytes-read / documents-read events (the direct cost signal — Convex bills on function calls + bandwidth), `tables` for row counts (a table's size bounds its scan cost), `functionSpec` for the surface. If there's no usage/traffic yet, say so and estimate from the query SHAPES instead (a `.collect()` on a table projected to grow is a future cost even with zero traffic today).
3. ATTRIBUTE: rank functions by bytes/documents read per call × observed (or asked-about) call volume — the product is the cost driver, not either alone. A cheap-per-call function called constantly can outweigh an expensive rare one; show both factors.
4. PROJECT: state how the top drivers scale — a full-table `.collect()` grows LINEARLY with the table (cost compounds as data accumulates); an indexed `.take(n)` stays flat. Give the user the shape of the curve ('this is O(table size) per call — fine at 1k rows, a bill at 1M'), not a false-precision dollar figure.
5. NAME THE CHEAPEST FIX per driver — index + `.withIndex` instead of scan, `.paginate`/`.take` instead of `.collect`, an aggregate component for counts, caching a hot read — and emit it as a cost-class finding on the bus (evidence: the insight event + the projected growth) pointing at convex-expert/convex-advisor for the actual change.
6. CONFIRM-COST for paid actions: if the flow includes anything metered (a domain purchase, cloud provisioning, a plan change), STATE the price and recurrence explicitly and get an explicit yes BEFORE proceeding — never let a paid action happen as a side effect (the cost-confirm gate).
7. REPORT: the current cost drivers ranked, each with its evidence + growth shape + fix, and a plain bottom line ('your spend is dominated by messages:list reading the whole table every call; index it and it drops ~100x'). Honest precision: Convex pricing changes and depends on plan — give relative/shape guidance and cite the pricing page for absolute numbers rather than inventing a dollar total.
## Rules
- Cost = data-read-per-call × call-volume — always show both factors; a cheap function called constantly can cost more than an expensive rare one.
- Read the deployment's own insights/bytes-read evidence for spend; with no traffic yet, price the query SHAPES (a scan on a growing table is a future cost).
- Give the growth CURVE, not false-precision dollars: O(table) scans compound as data accumulates; indexed access stays flat. Cite the pricing page for absolute figures.
- Every cost driver names its cheapest fix and emits a cost-class finding on the bus pointing at the fixer (convex-expert/advisor).
- Confirm-cost for any metered/paid action: state the price + recurrence and get an explicit yes BEFORE it happens — never as a side effect.
- Read-only over dev/prod (deploy-guard); insights is cloud+user-auth only. Cost composes convex-advisor's evidence but frames it as money, not latency.