返回 Skills 目录
lilmgenius/paperthin已通过检查

SKILL DETAIL

ssotize

lilmgenius/paperthin/ssotize

ssotize 旨在强制执行单一事实来源(SSOT)原则:一个事实对应一个权威位置,其他所有需要该事实的地方都通过引用指向该位置,而不是复制内容。引用不会漂移,而副本会。该技能以只读审计开始,识别范围内的具体事实,枚举所有出现位置,并通过第二种方法重新枚举以确保没有遗漏。然后,它会对每个出现位置进行分类(精确副本、改写、部分、过时或矛盾),选择最权威且维护最频繁的规范位置,并为每个非规范出现位置决定操作(去重、引用或协调)。 在编辑之前,ssotize 会报告详细的审计结果,包括出现位置表、提议的规范位置及理由、需要合并的独特细节、需要决策的矛盾以及精确的变更计划。只有在用户明确批准后,它才会执行变更:使规范位置完整且最新,将仅存在于副本中的独特细节合并进去,协调矛盾,将每个重复项替换为对规范位置的实时引用,并移除冗余副本。该技能遵循严格的规则,包括只读审计阶段、不虚构漂移、不跨信任边界合并、编辑安全性(如存在性断言和 Unicode 安全)以及平台感知的引用策略。

安装量 · 384查看来源

Installation

npx skills add https://github.com/lilmgenius/paperthin --skill ssotize

技能文件

SKILL.md

最近同步 · 2026年8月27日

SKILL.md›
---
name: ssotize
description: "Audit and consolidate a fact that's scattered across places into one canonical source, after approval, and replace the rest with references. Use when asked to find duplication, check consistency, locate the source of truth, deduplicate, consolidate, unify, or establish SSOT across artifacts or platforms. Starts read-only, reports the map and plan, then mutates only after explicit approval."
---

Find where one truth lives, get approval for the consolidation plan, then collapse it into one canonical home.

## Goal

Enforce Single Source of Truth (SSOT): one fact = one home, and every other place that needs it references that home instead of copying it. References don't drift; copies do. This mutates artifacts, so it is deliberate and loss-averse.

`ssotize` starts as a read-only audit. It names the truth in scope, finds every copy, chooses the canonical home, and reports the exact consolidation plan. Only after the user approves that plan does it mutate artifacts.

Use this to **establish or repair** SSOT — messy, legacy, or freshly-scaffolded states. Once SSOT holds, don't overuse it: consolidation is a one-time repair, not ongoing upkeep. When a read-only checker and a mutating follow-up have become one inseparable workflow, fold the checker into the consolidator and keep the approval gate; splitting the reflex only makes the safer first half easier to skip.

## Workflow

1. Name the truth in scope — the specific fact, value, spec, decision, status, or definition being tracked, not the whole document.
2. Audit read-only first: enumerate every occurrence across the given artifacts and platforms.
3. Re-enumerate by a second method — a different search term, synonym, or tool — and confirm it surfaces no occurrence the first pass missed.
4. Classify each occurrence: exact copy, paraphrase, partial, stale, or contradictory.
5. Pick the canonical home — the most authoritative and most-maintained location, closest to where the fact actually changes. Never promote a weak copy just because it is convenient; extract a new canonical home if none exists.
6. Decide the action per non-canonical occurrence: **dedupe** (redundant copy), **reference** (docs should link to canonical, code should import/source/include it, config should use a shared read), or **reconcile** (it disagrees and needs a human call).
7. Report the audit before editing: a table of occurrences (location · kind · action), the proposed canonical home with a one-line justification, unique details that must be folded into it, contradictions that need a decision, and the exact mutation plan.
8. Ask for explicit approval to execute the mutation plan. If approval is not given, stop after the read-only report.
9. Make or extract the canonical home complete and current — fold in any unique detail that lived only in a copy. Never lose information to consolidation.
10. Reconcile contradictions in the canonical home first; when the correct value is ambiguous, confirm it before replacing anything.
11. Replace each duplicate with a live reference to the canonical home — for docs, use a link, a "see <home>", a quote-with-link, or a transclude where the platform supports it; for code, use an import/source/include of the shared home; for config, use a shared read from the one maintained file.
12. Remove the now-redundant copies. Where removal would orphan a reader, leave a one-line pointer instead of deleting outright.

## Rules

- A pass that finds no scatter to consolidate changes nothing.
- The audit phase is read-only. Do not edit, move, or delete before the user approves the mutation plan.
- An empty findings list is a valid result — never invent drift to justify a consolidation.
- Keep contradictions separate from plain duplicates; never silently decide which conflicting value is "true".
- Flag any detail that lives only in a non-canonical copy — it must be folded into the canonical home before that copy can be cut.
- Don't consolidate across a trust/permission boundary (private → public, customer-facing → internal) without explicit confirmation.
- Mutate with edit-safety: assert each replace target exists before touching it (report a MISS, never a silent no-op), edit unicode-safe (`PYTHONUTF8=1`), and act per occurrence, never a blanket sweep; make structural code moves with language-aware tools or scripted AST/parser edits, never scripted text rewrites.
- Be platform-aware: transclude where possible, else link to a stable anchor the reader can follow; prefer a reference over a hard deletion when a platform can't link back.
- When the same project fact is split between a read-only audit artifact and a mutating artifact, and the audit has no independent durable use, treat that as SSOT scatter: propose folding the audit into the mutating artifact, then execute only after approval.

## Verification

Before finishing:

1. The audit was reported before mutation and approval was received, unless the run stayed read-only.
2. The canonical home holds the complete, current truth on its own.
3. Every former copy now references it, and each reference resolves.
4. No unique detail was lost and nothing was orphaned.
5. Contradictions were reconciled to one value, not left duplicated.
6. Report what was consolidated, where the canonical home is, what was only audited, and what still needs a human decision.