返回 Skills 目录
warpdotdev/common-skills已通过检查

SKILL DETAIL

implement-specs

warpdotdev/common-skills/implement-specs

此技能用于在产品和规格批准后实现功能。它指导工程师从PRODUCT.md和TECH.md中读取已批准的规格,将其作为用户行为和架构的权威来源,然后规划并实现功能。在实现过程中,如果行为或设计发生变化,应更新规格文件,并保持所有更改在同一个PR中,以便审查与最终交付的功能保持一致。该技能还建议为大型功能提供可选的跟踪文档,如PROJECT_LOG.md和DECISIONS.md,并强调通过单元测试和集成测试进行验证。

安装量 · 345查看来源

Installation

npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills --skill implement-specs

技能文件

SKILL.md

最近同步 · 2026年9月30日

SKILL.md›
---
name: implement-specs
description: Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, keeping specs and code aligned in the same PR as implementation evolves. Use after the product and tech specs are approved and the next step is building the feature.
---

# implement-specs

Implement an approved feature from `PRODUCT.md` and `TECH.md`.

## Overview

Use this skill after the product and tech specs are approved. The goal is to build the feature described by the specs while keeping the checked-in specs and the implementation aligned as the work evolves.

Approved specs should live directly under a ticket-named directory in `specs/`, for example `specs/APP-1234/PRODUCT.md` and `specs/APP-1234/TECH.md`.

In many cases, the implementation should be pushed in the same PR as the product and tech specs. As the engineer iterates, changes to `PRODUCT.md`, `TECH.md`, and the code should all be pushed in that same PR so review stays anchored to the feature that will actually ship.

## Prerequisites

Before using this skill:

- confirm that `PRODUCT.md` exists
- confirm that `TECH.md` exists when the feature warranted one
- confirm that the relevant specs have been reviewed and approved enough to start implementation

## Workflow

### 1. Read the approved specs first

Treat:

- `PRODUCT.md` as the source of truth for user-facing behavior
- `TECH.md` as the source of truth for architecture, sequencing, and implementation shape

Make sure you understand the expected behavior, constraints, risks, and validation plan before writing code.

### 2. Offer optional implementation aids for large features

For large or long-running features, optionally offer one of these aids to the user before implementation begins:

- `PROJECT_LOG.md` to track checkpoints, explored paths, partial findings, and current implementation state
- `DECISIONS.md` to capture concrete product and technical decisions made during the PRD and tech design process

These are optional aids, not required deliverables. Offer them when they would reduce confusion or help future agents avoid re-exploring the same paths.

### 3. Plan and implement against the specs

Break the work into concrete implementation steps, then implement the feature against the approved specs.

During implementation:

- keep behavior aligned with `PRODUCT.md`
- keep architecture and sequencing aligned with `TECH.md`
- add or update tests and verification artifacts as the work lands

Use the same PR for the specs and implementation when practical so the full feature evolution is reviewable in one place.

### 4. Update specs as the implementation evolves

If implementation reveals that the intended behavior or design should change, update the checked-in specs rather than letting them go stale.

In particular:

- update `PRODUCT.md` when user-facing behavior, UX, edge cases, or success criteria change
- update `TECH.md` when architecture, sequencing, module boundaries, or validation strategy change
- keep those updates in the same PR as the corresponding code changes

The PR should describe the feature that actually ships, not just the initial draft of the specs.

### 5. Verify against the specs

Before considering the work complete, verify that the code matches the current specs.

Prefer:

- unit tests and regression coverage that follow the repository's local testing conventions
- integration or end-to-end tests for important user flows

## Best Practices

- Keep specs and code synchronized throughout implementation.
- Prefer updating the spec immediately when decisions change rather than batching spec cleanup until the end.
- Use optional tracking documents only when they add real value for a complex feature.
- Keep the same PR coherent: spec updates, code changes, tests, and optional tracking docs should all support the same feature narrative.

## Related Skills

- `spec-driven-implementation`
- `write-product-spec`
- `write-tech-spec`